Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Johnson & Johnson and Mesoblast Limited

Comparative Cost Analysis: J&J vs. Mesoblast

__timestampJohnson & JohnsonMesoblast Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 20142274600000025434000
Thursday, January 1, 20152153600000023783000
Friday, January 1, 20162168500000029763000
Sunday, January 1, 20172535400000012065000
Monday, January 1, 2018270910000005508000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192755600000075173000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202842700000081497000
Friday, January 1, 20212340200000085731000
Saturday, January 1, 20222459600000063572000
Sunday, January 1, 20232655300000054922000
Monday, January 1, 20242747100000041070000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

Cost of Revenue: A Comparative Analysis

Johnson & Johnson vs. Mesoblast Limited

In the ever-evolving landscape of the healthcare industry, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's financial health. Johnson & Johnson, a titan in the pharmaceutical sector, has consistently maintained a robust cost of revenue, peaking at approximately $28.4 billion in 2020. This represents a 25% increase from 2014, showcasing their ability to manage production costs effectively over the years.

In contrast, Mesoblast Limited, a smaller player in the biotech field, has experienced more volatility. Their cost of revenue surged by over 230% from 2014 to 2020, reaching a high of around $85.7 million. This fluctuation highlights the challenges faced by emerging biotech firms in scaling operations.

While Johnson & Johnson's data for 2024 is missing, Mesoblast's figures suggest a potential stabilization. This comparison underscores the diverse financial strategies within the healthcare sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025