Cost of Revenue Trends: Johnson & Johnson vs Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

Comparing Cost Dynamics: J&J vs. Neurocrine Biosciences

__timestampJohnson & JohnsonNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20142274600000014400000
Thursday, January 1, 20152153600000033800000
Friday, January 1, 20162168500000035900000
Sunday, January 1, 2017253540000001254000
Monday, January 1, 2018270910000004889000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019275560000007400000
Wednesday, January 1, 20202842700000010100000
Friday, January 1, 20212340200000014300000
Saturday, January 1, 20222459600000023200000
Sunday, January 1, 20232655300000039700000
Monday, January 1, 20242747100000034000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. Johnson & Johnson, a stalwart in healthcare, has consistently maintained a high cost of revenue, averaging around $24.9 billion annually from 2014 to 2023. This reflects its expansive operations and diverse product lines. In contrast, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc., a specialized biopharmaceutical company, has seen its cost of revenue grow from a modest $1.44 million in 2014 to nearly $39.7 million in 2023, marking a staggering increase of over 2,600%. This growth underscores Neurocrine's expanding footprint in the market.

While Johnson & Johnson's costs have shown a steady upward trend, peaking in 2020, Neurocrine's costs have been more volatile, reflecting its dynamic growth phase. This comparison highlights the differing strategies and market positions of these two companies, offering valuable insights into their operational efficiencies and market strategies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025