Cost of Revenue Trends: HUTCHMED (China) Limited vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Diverging cost trends in HUTCHMED vs BioCryst: A decade in review.

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 201412200072049000
Thursday, January 1, 20151896000110777000
Friday, January 1, 20162699000156328000
Sunday, January 1, 20171702000175820000
Monday, January 1, 2018471000143944000
Tuesday, January 1, 20194101000160152000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201676000188519000
Friday, January 1, 20217264000258234000
Saturday, January 1, 20226594000311103000
Sunday, January 1, 20234661000384447000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Cost of Revenue Trends: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding cost dynamics is crucial. Over the past decade, HUTCHMED (China) Limited and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their cost of revenue. HUTCHMED's cost of revenue has surged by over 400% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its aggressive expansion and increased production capabilities. In contrast, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals has experienced a more modest growth of approximately 38% in the same period, indicating a more stable cost structure.

Key Insights

  • HUTCHMED's Growth: From 2014 to 2023, HUTCHMED's cost of revenue increased from approximately $72 million to $384 million, highlighting its rapid growth in the Chinese market.
  • BioCryst's Stability: BioCryst's cost of revenue, starting at $122,000 in 2014, peaked at $7.3 million in 2021, before stabilizing around $4.7 million in 2023.

These trends underscore the strategic differences between the two companies, with HUTCHMED focusing on expansion and BioCryst maintaining a steady course.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025