Curtiss-Wright Corporation and Clean Harbors, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

SG&A Spending: Clean Harbors vs. Curtiss-Wright

__timestampClean Harbors, Inc.Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 2014437921000426301000
Thursday, January 1, 2015414164000411801000
Friday, January 1, 2016422015000383793000
Sunday, January 1, 2017456648000418544000
Monday, January 1, 2018503747000433110000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019484054000422272000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020451044000412825000
Friday, January 1, 2021537962000443096000
Saturday, January 1, 2022627391000445679000
Sunday, January 1, 2023671161000496812000
Monday, January 1, 2024739629000518857000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Spending Trends: Curtiss-Wright vs. Clean Harbors

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding the nuances of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Clean Harbors, Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation have demonstrated distinct spending patterns. From 2014 to 2023, Clean Harbors' SG&A expenses surged by approximately 53%, peaking in 2023. In contrast, Curtiss-Wright's expenses grew by about 17% over the same period, reflecting a more conservative approach.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

Clean Harbors' aggressive increase in SG&A spending, particularly in the last few years, suggests a strategic investment in growth and expansion. Meanwhile, Curtiss-Wright's steadier rise indicates a focus on efficiency and cost management. These trends offer a window into each company's strategic priorities and market positioning. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, such insights are invaluable for investors and analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025