Curtiss-Wright Corporation vs American Airlines Group Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends

Explore the contrasting SG&A expense trends of two industry giants.

__timestampAmerican Airlines Group Inc.Curtiss-Wright Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141544000000426301000
Thursday, January 1, 20151394000000411801000
Friday, January 1, 20161323000000383793000
Sunday, January 1, 20171477000000418544000
Monday, January 1, 20181520000000433110000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191602000000422272000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020513000000412825000
Friday, January 1, 20211098000000443096000
Saturday, January 1, 20221815000000445679000
Sunday, January 1, 20231799000000496812000
Monday, January 1, 2024518857000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Analyzing SG&A Expense Trends: Curtiss-Wright vs. American Airlines

In the ever-evolving landscape of corporate finance, understanding a company's Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for evaluating its operational efficiency and overall financial health. This article delves into the SG&A expense trends of two prominent companies: Curtiss-Wright Corporation, a leader in aerospace and defense, and American Airlines Group Inc., a major player in the airline industry. Both companies have shown remarkable resilience and adaptability in their respective fields, making their financial trajectories particularly interesting to analyze.

A Decade of Financial Evolution

From 2014 to 2023, these two companies have navigated various economic climates, including periods of growth and significant challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Over this period, American Airlines has consistently reported higher SG&A expenses compared to Curtiss-Wright. For instance, in 2014, American Airlines recorded SG&A expenses of approximately $1.54 billion, which represented a staggering 78% of Curtiss-Wright's SG&A expenses of around $426 million. This disparity highlights the operational scale and complexity of the airline industry compared to the more specialized defense sector.

Trends Over the Years

As we progress through the years, American Airlines' SG&A expenses peaked in 2022 at nearly $1.82 billion, a remarkable 18% increase from 2021. This surge can be attributed to the airline's efforts to recover from the pandemic's impact, including increased marketing and operational costs to attract passengers back to air travel. In contrast, Curtiss-Wright's SG&A expenses have shown a more stable trend, with a peak of approximately $497 million in 2023, reflecting a steady growth of around 11% since 2020.

The data reveals that while American Airlines has faced sharp fluctuations in its SG&A expenses, Curtiss-Wright has maintained a more measured approach. The defense sector's relative stability during economic downturns has likely contributed to this trend, allowing Curtiss-Wright to manage its expenses effectively.

Implications for Investors

For investors, these trends provide valuable insights into how each company manages its operational costs in relation to revenue generation. American Airlines, with its higher SG&A expenses, may present a riskier investment during economic downturns, particularly given the industry's sensitivity to external shocks. Conversely, Curtiss-Wright's more controlled SG&A expenses suggest a robust operational framework that could be more resilient in turbulent times.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the SG&A expense trends of Curtiss-Wright Corporation and American Airlines Group Inc. offer a compelling narrative about the differing dynamics of the aerospace and airline industries. As the market continues to evolve, understanding these financial metrics will be essential for stakeholders looking to navigate the complexities of corporate finance. Investors should consider these trends not just as numbers, but as reflections of each company's strategic approach to managing costs and driving growth.

Whether you are an investor, analyst, or simply a finance enthusiast, keeping an eye on SG&A expenses can provide critical insights into a company's operational effectiveness and long-term viability.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025