__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Intel Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1939000000 | 24191000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2074000000 | 23067000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2539000000 | 22795000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 4343000000 | 26563000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 4953000000 | 32329000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 3735000000 | 33254000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 4844000000 | 36115000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 7594000000 | 33874000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 8228000000 | 15610000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 8169000000 | 11242000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 8259000000 | 1203000000 |
Cracking the code
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, financial performance is a key indicator of a company's resilience and growth. Over the past decade, Applied Materials, Inc. and Intel Corporation have showcased contrasting EBITDA trends. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials experienced a remarkable growth trajectory, with EBITDA increasing by over 325%, peaking at approximately $8.26 billion in 2024. This growth underscores the company's strategic advancements in semiconductor equipment manufacturing.
Conversely, Intel's EBITDA journey reflects a more volatile path. While Intel maintained a strong EBITDA, peaking at $36.12 billion in 2020, recent years have seen a decline, with 2023 figures dropping to $11.24 billion. This 69% decrease highlights the challenges faced by the tech giant amidst industry shifts and competitive pressures.
As we look to the future, these trends offer valuable insights into the strategic directions and market dynamics shaping these industry leaders.
Annual Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Intel Corporation
Cost of Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Intel Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Intel Corporation: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Analyzing R&D Budgets: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Intel Corporation
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Intel Corporation
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc.
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Amphenol Corporation
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. Compared to KLA Corporation
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Infosys Limited
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison