__timestamp | Applied Materials, Inc. | Intel Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 890000000 | 8136000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 897000000 | 7930000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 819000000 | 8397000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 890000000 | 7474000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 1002000000 | 6750000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 982000000 | 6150000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1093000000 | 6180000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1229000000 | 6543000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1438000000 | 7002000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1628000000 | 5634000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1797000000 | 5507000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of the semiconductor industry, understanding the financial strategies of key players is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Applied Materials, Inc. and Intel Corporation from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Intel consistently outspent Applied Materials, with SG&A expenses peaking at approximately $8.4 billion in 2016. In contrast, Applied Materials showed a steady increase, culminating in a 100% rise from 2014 to 2023, reaching nearly $1.8 billion. Notably, Intel's expenses saw a significant dip in 2023, dropping to $5.6 billion, highlighting potential strategic shifts or cost-cutting measures. This financial narrative underscores the dynamic nature of corporate strategies in the tech sector, where efficient management of SG&A expenses can be a key differentiator in maintaining competitive advantage.
Annual Revenue Comparison: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Intel Corporation
Cost of Revenue Trends: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Intel Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Intel Corporation: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc. Trends and Insights
Analyzing R&D Budgets: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Intel Corporation
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Applied Materials, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or KLA Corporation
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Applied Materials, Inc. and Amphenol Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. and Infosys Limited: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Applied Materials, Inc. or MicroStrategy Incorporated
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Applied Materials, Inc. Against Intel Corporation
Applied Materials, Inc. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared