| __timestamp | Analog Devices, Inc. | Applied Materials, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 943421000 | 1939000000 |
| Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1059384000 | 2074000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1255468000 | 2539000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1665464000 | 4343000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2018 | 2706642000 | 4953000000 |
| Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 2527491000 | 3735000000 |
| Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 2317701000 | 4844000000 |
| Friday, January 1, 2021 | 2600723000 | 7594000000 |
| Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 5611579000 | 8228000000 |
| Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 6150827000 | 8169000000 |
| Monday, January 1, 2024 | 2032798000 | 8259000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the competitive landscape of semiconductor manufacturing, Applied Materials, Inc. and Analog Devices, Inc. have showcased remarkable financial trajectories over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Applied Materials consistently outperformed Analog Devices in terms of EBITDA, with a notable peak in 2022, where it reached approximately 8.2 billion, marking a 324% increase from its 2014 figures. Analog Devices, while trailing, demonstrated a robust growth of 551% over the same period, peaking at around 6.2 billion in 2023.
This financial journey highlights the dynamic nature of the semiconductor industry, where innovation and strategic investments drive profitability. The data underscores Applied Materials' dominance, particularly in 2021, with a staggering 57% year-over-year growth. As the industry evolves, these companies continue to set benchmarks, reflecting their resilience and adaptability in a rapidly changing market.
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc.: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Applied Materials, Inc. and Analog Devices, Inc.
Key Insights on Gross Profit: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc.
Who Prioritizes Innovation? R&D Spending Compared for Applied Materials, Inc. and Analog Devices, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Analog Devices, Inc. Trends and Insights
A Side-by-Side Analysis of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Lam Research Corporation
Comparative EBITDA Analysis: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Amphenol Corporation
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Applied Materials, Inc. Against Intel Corporation
A Professional Review of EBITDA: Applied Materials, Inc. Compared to KLA Corporation
Professional EBITDA Benchmarking: Applied Materials, Inc. vs Infosys Limited
Applied Materials, Inc. vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc.: In-Depth EBITDA Performance Comparison