Cost of Revenue Comparison: Thomson Reuters Corporation vs Fastenal Company

Comparing Cost of Revenue: Fastenal vs Thomson Reuters

__timestampFastenal CompanyThomson Reuters Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 201418361050009209000000
Thursday, January 1, 201519202530008810000000
Friday, January 1, 201619972590008232000000
Sunday, January 1, 201722269000008079000000
Monday, January 1, 201825662000004131000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201928183000002431000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202030795000002269000000
Friday, January 1, 202132337000002478000000
Saturday, January 1, 202237648000002408000000
Sunday, January 1, 202339922000004095000000
Monday, January 1, 20244144100000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Cost of Revenue: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, understanding the cost of revenue is crucial for evaluating a company's financial health. This comparison between Thomson Reuters Corporation and Fastenal Company from 2014 to 2023 offers intriguing insights.

A Decade of Change

Fastenal Company, a leader in industrial supplies, has seen its cost of revenue grow steadily, increasing by approximately 126% over the decade. This growth reflects its expanding market presence and operational scale. In contrast, Thomson Reuters, a giant in the information services sector, experienced a significant decline of around 56% in its cost of revenue from 2014 to 2022, before a resurgence in 2023. This fluctuation may indicate strategic shifts or market challenges.

Missing Data

Notably, data for Thomson Reuters in 2024 is missing, suggesting potential reporting delays or strategic changes. Such gaps highlight the dynamic nature of financial reporting and the importance of continuous monitoring.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025