Eli Lilly and Company or Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Eli Lilly vs. Gilead: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampEli Lilly and CompanyGilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201466208000002983000000
Thursday, January 1, 201565330000003426000000
Friday, January 1, 201664520000003398000000
Sunday, January 1, 201765881000003878000000
Monday, January 1, 201859751000004056000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201962138000004381000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202061212000005151000000
Friday, January 1, 202164316000005246000000
Saturday, January 1, 202264404000005673000000
Sunday, January 1, 202369412000006090000000
Monday, January 1, 202485938000006091000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Managing SG&A Costs: Eli Lilly vs. Gilead Sciences

In the competitive pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Eli Lilly and Gilead Sciences have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, Eli Lilly's SG&A expenses have shown a steady increase, peaking at approximately $6.94 billion in 2023. In contrast, Gilead Sciences started with lower SG&A costs, around $2.98 billion in 2014, but experienced a significant rise, reaching $6.09 billion by 2023.

Eli Lilly's expenses grew by about 5% over the period, while Gilead's surged by over 100%. This stark difference highlights Eli Lilly's more consistent cost management strategy compared to Gilead's rapid expansion. As investors and industry analysts evaluate these trends, understanding the implications of SG&A expenses on overall financial health becomes paramount.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025