__timestamp | AECOM | Ferrovial SE |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 4452451000 | 1131000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 17454692000 | 1143000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 16768001000 | 1267000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 17519682000 | 1345000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 19504863000 | 985000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 19359884000 | 949000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 12530416000 | 1005000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 12542431000 | 1077000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 12300208000 | 1197000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 13432996000 | 1129000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 15021157000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the competitive landscape of global infrastructure, cost efficiency is paramount. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Ferrovial SE and AECOM from 2014 to 2023. AECOM, a leader in infrastructure services, consistently reported higher costs, peaking in 2018 with a 33% increase from 2014. In contrast, Ferrovial SE, a Spanish multinational, maintained a more stable cost structure, with a modest 19% increase over the same period. Notably, AECOM's cost of revenue in 2023 was approximately 12 times that of Ferrovial SE, highlighting significant operational scale differences. However, data for 2024 is incomplete, suggesting a need for cautious interpretation. This comparison underscores the strategic approaches of these industry giants, offering insights into their operational efficiencies and market strategies.
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Avery Dennison Corporation
Ferrovial SE vs AECOM: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Graco Inc.
Ferrovial SE vs CNH Industrial N.V.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Ferrovial SE vs Comfort Systems USA, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Ferrovial SE vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue: Key Insights for Ferrovial SE and Pool Corporation