Ferrovial SE vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored

Cost Efficiency Showdown: Ferrovial SE vs. Stanley Black & Decker

__timestampFerrovial SEStanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201411310000007235900000
Thursday, January 1, 201511430000007099800000
Friday, January 1, 201612670000007139700000
Sunday, January 1, 201713450000007969200000
Monday, January 1, 20189850000009080500000
Tuesday, January 1, 20199490000009636700000
Wednesday, January 1, 202010050000009566700000
Friday, January 1, 2021107700000010423000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022119700000012663300000
Sunday, January 1, 2023112900000011683100000
Monday, January 1, 202410851300000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

Analyzing Cost Efficiency: Ferrovial SE vs. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Ferrovial SE and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Ferrovial SE maintained a relatively stable cost of revenue, averaging around €1.12 billion annually, with a slight dip in 2019. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. exhibited a more dynamic trend, with costs peaking at approximately $12.66 billion in 2022, marking a 75% increase from 2014. This stark contrast highlights the differing operational strategies and market conditions faced by these industry giants. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, understanding such financial dynamics is crucial for stakeholders aiming to optimize performance and drive growth.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025