__timestamp | Ferrovial SE | Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 1131000000 | 7235900000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 1143000000 | 7099800000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 1267000000 | 7139700000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1345000000 | 7969200000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 985000000 | 9080500000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 949000000 | 9636700000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1005000000 | 9566700000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 1077000000 | 10423000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1197000000 | 12663300000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 1129000000 | 11683100000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 10851300000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, cost efficiency remains a pivotal factor for success. This analysis delves into the cost of revenue trends for Ferrovial SE and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Ferrovial SE maintained a relatively stable cost of revenue, averaging around €1.12 billion annually, with a slight dip in 2018 and 2019. In contrast, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. exhibited a more dynamic trend, with costs peaking at approximately $12.66 billion in 2022, reflecting a 75% increase from 2014. This comparison highlights the contrasting strategies of a European infrastructure giant and an American tool manufacturer. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, understanding these cost dynamics is crucial for stakeholders aiming to optimize operational efficiency.
Breaking Down Revenue Trends: Ferrovial SE vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Analyzing Cost of Revenue: Ferrovial SE and Southwest Airlines Co.
Ferrovial SE vs AerCap Holdings N.V.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Ferrovial SE vs Carlisle Companies Incorporated
Revenue Insights: Ferrovial SE and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. Performance Compared
Ferrovial SE vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored