GSK plc or United Therapeutics Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

GSK vs. United Therapeutics: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampGSK plcUnited Therapeutics Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20148246000000381287000
Thursday, January 1, 20159232000000452612000
Friday, January 1, 20169366000000316800000
Sunday, January 1, 20179672000000330100000
Monday, January 1, 20189915000000265800000
Tuesday, January 1, 201911402000000336200000
Wednesday, January 1, 202011456000000423900000
Friday, January 1, 202110975000000467000000
Saturday, January 1, 20228372000000487000000
Sunday, January 1, 20239385000000477100000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

Managing SG&A Costs: GSK plc vs. United Therapeutics Corporation

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, GSK plc and United Therapeutics Corporation have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, GSK's SG&A expenses averaged around $9.8 billion annually, peaking in 2020. In contrast, United Therapeutics maintained a leaner structure, with average annual expenses of approximately $394 million, showcasing a more efficient cost management strategy.

Despite GSK's larger scale, United Therapeutics' ability to keep SG&A costs at roughly 4% of GSK's expenses highlights their strategic focus on operational efficiency. This comparison underscores the importance of cost management in sustaining competitive advantage in the pharmaceutical industry. As companies navigate the complexities of healthcare markets, these insights offer valuable lessons in balancing growth with cost control.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025