ImmunityBio, Inc. and Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Biopharma SG&A Trends: Steady vs. Volatile Growth

__timestampAmphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.ImmunityBio, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014403730004326000
Thursday, January 1, 201546974000226206000
Friday, January 1, 20164729800094391000
Sunday, January 1, 20175091800053821000
Monday, January 1, 20185804400035463000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196310900046456000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206515700071318000
Friday, January 1, 202168920000135256000
Saturday, January 1, 202266592000102708000
Sunday, January 1, 202380393000129620000
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Biopharma Companies

In the competitive landscape of biopharmaceuticals, understanding spending patterns can offer valuable insights into a company's strategic priorities. Over the past decade, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and ImmunityBio, Inc. have demonstrated distinct approaches to their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.

From 2014 to 2023, Amphastar's SG&A expenses grew steadily, peaking at approximately $80 million in 2023, marking a 99% increase from 2014. In contrast, ImmunityBio's spending exhibited more volatility, with a dramatic spike in 2015, reaching over $226 million, before stabilizing around $130 million in recent years. This fluctuation suggests a period of aggressive expansion or restructuring.

These trends highlight the differing strategies: Amphastar's consistent growth versus ImmunityBio's more dynamic spending. Investors and analysts can glean insights into each company's operational focus and market positioning by examining these financial trajectories.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025