ImmunityBio, Inc. vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends

Biotech Giants' SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Growth

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.ImmunityBio, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201474610004326000
Thursday, January 1, 201513047000226206000
Friday, January 1, 20161125300094391000
Sunday, January 1, 20171393300053821000
Monday, January 1, 20182951400035463000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193712100046456000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206792900071318000
Friday, January 1, 2021118818000135256000
Saturday, January 1, 2022159371000102708000
Sunday, January 1, 2023213894000129620000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Expense Trends: ImmunityBio, Inc. vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

In the ever-evolving biotech industry, understanding financial trends is crucial for investors and stakeholders. This analysis focuses on the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent companies: ImmunityBio, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Over this period, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals saw a staggering 2,768% increase in SG&A expenses, peaking in 2023. ImmunityBio, on the other hand, experienced a more modest 2,894% rise, with a notable spike in 2015. By 2023, BioCryst's expenses were approximately 65% higher than ImmunityBio's, highlighting a significant divergence in their financial strategies.

These trends reflect the companies' strategic investments in marketing, administration, and sales, crucial for their growth and competitive positioning. Investors should consider these financial dynamics when evaluating potential opportunities in the biotech sector.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025