Pfizer Inc. or BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Pfizer vs. BioCryst: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Pfizer Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014746100014097000000
Thursday, January 1, 20151304700014809000000
Friday, January 1, 20161125300014837000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171393300014784000000
Monday, January 1, 20182951400014455000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193712100014350000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206792900011615000000
Friday, January 1, 202111881800012703000000
Saturday, January 1, 202215937100013677000000
Sunday, January 1, 202321389400014771000000
Monday, January 1, 202414730000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

Managing SG&A Costs: Pfizer vs. BioCryst Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Pfizer Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown contrasting approaches to handling these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Pfizer's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, averaging around $14 billion annually. In contrast, BioCryst's expenses have surged by over 2700%, from approximately $7 million in 2014 to $214 million in 2023.

This stark difference highlights Pfizer's ability to maintain cost efficiency despite its larger scale, while BioCryst's rising expenses may reflect its aggressive growth strategy. As the pharmaceutical landscape evolves, these companies' approaches to SG&A management will be pivotal in determining their financial health and competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025