Johnson & Johnson or Catalent, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: J&J vs. Catalent

__timestampCatalent, Inc.Johnson & Johnson
Wednesday, January 1, 201433480000021954000000
Thursday, January 1, 201533730000021203000000
Friday, January 1, 201635810000019945000000
Sunday, January 1, 201740260000021420000000
Monday, January 1, 201846260000022540000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201951200000022178000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202057790000022084000000
Friday, January 1, 202168700000020118000000
Saturday, January 1, 202284400000019046000000
Sunday, January 1, 202383100000020112000000
Monday, January 1, 2024935000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Tale of Two Giants: SG&A Cost Management

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical and healthcare industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Johnson & Johnson, a stalwart in the industry, has consistently managed its SG&A costs, averaging around $21 billion annually from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Catalent, Inc., a rising star, has seen its SG&A expenses grow from approximately $334 million in 2014 to $935 million in 2024, reflecting a significant expansion in its operations.

While Johnson & Johnson's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, Catalent's costs have surged by nearly 180% over the decade. This growth indicates Catalent's aggressive expansion strategy, but also raises questions about its long-term cost management. As we look to the future, the ability of these companies to balance growth with cost efficiency will be pivotal in determining their market positions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025