Merck & Co., Inc. or Catalent, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Merck vs. Catalent: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampCatalent, Inc.Merck & Co., Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201433480000011606000000
Thursday, January 1, 201533730000010313000000
Friday, January 1, 20163581000009762000000
Sunday, January 1, 20174026000009830000000
Monday, January 1, 201846260000010102000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201951200000010615000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20205779000008955000000
Friday, January 1, 20216870000009634000000
Saturday, January 1, 202284400000010042000000
Sunday, January 1, 202383100000010504000000
Monday, January 1, 2024935000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: Merck & Co., Inc. or Catalent, Inc.?

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Merck & Co., Inc. and Catalent, Inc. have shown distinct approaches to handling these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Merck's SG&A expenses have consistently been higher, averaging around 10 times more than Catalent's. However, Catalent has demonstrated a significant upward trend, with a 179% increase in SG&A expenses from 2014 to 2024. In contrast, Merck's expenses have shown more stability, with a slight decrease of about 10% over the same period. This data suggests that while Merck maintains a larger scale of operations, Catalent is rapidly expanding its administrative capabilities. The missing data for 2024 for Merck indicates a potential shift or strategic change in their financial reporting.

Conclusion

Understanding these trends can provide valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and operational efficiencies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025