__timestamp | Catalent, Inc. | Merck & Co., Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 334800000 | 11606000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 337300000 | 10313000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 358100000 | 9762000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 402600000 | 9830000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 462600000 | 10102000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 512000000 | 10615000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 577900000 | 8955000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 687000000 | 9634000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 844000000 | 10042000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 831000000 | 10504000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 935000000 |
Igniting the spark of knowledge
In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, Merck & Co., Inc. and Catalent, Inc. have shown distinct approaches to handling these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Merck's SG&A expenses have consistently been higher, averaging around 10 times more than Catalent's. However, Catalent has demonstrated a significant upward trend, with a 179% increase in SG&A expenses from 2014 to 2024. In contrast, Merck's expenses have shown more stability, with a slight decrease of about 10% over the same period. This data suggests that while Merck maintains a larger scale of operations, Catalent is rapidly expanding its administrative capabilities. The missing data for 2024 for Merck indicates a potential shift or strategic change in their financial reporting.
Understanding these trends can provide valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and operational efficiencies.
Johnson & Johnson and Merck & Co., Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Merck & Co., Inc. vs AstraZeneca PLC Trends and Insights
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Merck & Co., Inc. vs Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited Trends and Insights
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Merck & Co., Inc. vs Verona Pharma plc
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Merck & Co., Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Merck & Co., Inc. or Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Merck & Co., Inc. and Celldex Therapeutics, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Merck & Co., Inc. vs Xencor, Inc. Trends and Insights
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Insmed Incorporated or Catalent, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. and Catalent, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Catalent, Inc. vs Viking Therapeutics, Inc. Trends and Insights
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Catalent, Inc. and Soleno Therapeutics, Inc.