__timestamp | Microsoft Corporation | Palo Alto Networks, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 20488000000 | 407912000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 20324000000 | 624261000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 19198000000 | 914400000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 19942000000 | 1117400000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 22223000000 | 1356200000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 23098000000 | 1605800000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 24709000000 | 1819800000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 25224000000 | 2144900000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 27725000000 | 2553900000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 30334000000 | 2991700000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 32065000000 | 3475000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding spending patterns can offer valuable insights into a company's strategic priorities. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. have shown distinct trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have grown by approximately 56%, reflecting its expansive growth and diversification strategies. In contrast, Palo Alto Networks, a leader in cybersecurity, has seen its SG&A expenses increase by a staggering 750% over the same period, highlighting its aggressive market expansion and investment in sales and marketing.
These trends underscore the differing strategic approaches of these tech giants, with Microsoft focusing on steady growth and Palo Alto Networks on rapid expansion.
Annual Revenue Comparison: Microsoft Corporation vs Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Cost of Revenue Trends: Microsoft Corporation vs Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Gross Profit Comparison: Microsoft Corporation and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Trends
Microsoft Corporation and Texas Instruments Incorporated: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Arista Networks, Inc.
Comparing Innovation Spending: Microsoft Corporation and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Sony Group Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Fiserv, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Fiserv, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or Analog Devices, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation or KLA Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?