__timestamp | Micron Technology, Inc. | Microsoft Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 707000000 | 20488000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 719000000 | 20324000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 659000000 | 19198000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 743000000 | 19942000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 813000000 | 22223000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 836000000 | 23098000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 881000000 | 24709000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 894000000 | 25224000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 1066000000 | 27725000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 920000000 | 30334000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 1129000000 | 32065000000 |
Data in motion
In the ever-evolving tech industry, understanding spending patterns is crucial for investors and analysts alike. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc. have demonstrated distinct approaches to their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2024, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 56%, reflecting its expansive growth strategy and market dominance. In contrast, Micron's SG&A expenses have increased by about 60%, indicating a more conservative yet steady growth trajectory.
Microsoft's SG&A expenses consistently outpace Micron's, with 2024 figures showing Microsoft spending nearly 28 times more than Micron. This disparity highlights Microsoft's aggressive investment in marketing and administration to maintain its competitive edge. Meanwhile, Micron's more modest spending aligns with its focus on operational efficiency and innovation in the semiconductor industry. These trends offer valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and market positioning.
Microsoft Corporation vs Micron Technology, Inc.: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Comparing Cost of Revenue Efficiency: Microsoft Corporation vs Micron Technology, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Arista Networks, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation or Micron Technology, Inc.: Who Invests More in Innovation?
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Sony Group Corporation
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Fiserv, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Fiserv, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or Analog Devices, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation or KLA Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
EBITDA Analysis: Evaluating Microsoft Corporation Against Micron Technology, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Lam Research Corporation