__timestamp | Microsoft Corporation | Sony Group Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 20488000000 | 1728520000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 20324000000 | 1811461000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 19198000000 | 1691930000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 19942000000 | 1505956000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 22223000000 | 1583197000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 23098000000 | 1576825000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 24709000000 | 1502625000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 25224000000 | 1469955000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 27725000000 | 1588473000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 30334000000 | 1969170000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 32065000000 | 2156156000000 |
Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of global technology giants, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders like Microsoft Corporation and Sony Group Corporation is crucial. Over the past decade, from 2014 to 2024, these two titans have demonstrated distinct approaches to managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses.
Microsoft's Growth: Microsoft's SG&A expenses have shown a steady increase, rising by approximately 56% from 2014 to 2024. This growth reflects Microsoft's aggressive expansion and investment in new technologies and markets.
Sony's Stability: In contrast, Sony's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, with a modest increase of about 25% over the same period. This stability suggests a more conservative approach, focusing on optimizing existing operations.
This analysis highlights the strategic differences between Microsoft and Sony, offering valuable insights into their financial priorities and market positioning.
Microsoft Corporation vs Sony Group Corporation: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Cost of Revenue Comparison: Microsoft Corporation vs Sony Group Corporation
Microsoft Corporation vs Sony Group Corporation: A Gross Profit Performance Breakdown
Microsoft Corporation and Texas Instruments Incorporated: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Arista Networks, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Fiserv, Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Microsoft Corporation vs Fiserv, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Microsoft Corporation or Analog Devices, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation and Micron Technology, Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Microsoft Corporation and Sony Group Corporation: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
Microsoft Corporation or KLA Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?