__timestamp | International Business Machines Corporation | Microsoft Corporation |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 22472000000 | 20488000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 19894000000 | 20324000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 20279000000 | 19198000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 19680000000 | 19942000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 19366000000 | 22223000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 18724000000 | 23098000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 20561000000 | 24709000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 18745000000 | 25224000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 17483000000 | 27725000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 17997000000 | 30334000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 29536000000 | 32065000000 |
In pursuit of knowledge
In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, cost management remains a pivotal factor for success. Over the past decade, Microsoft Corporation and International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) have demonstrated distinct strategies in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Microsoft's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 48%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in innovation. In contrast, IBM's expenses have seen a more conservative increase of around 20%, highlighting its focus on efficiency and restructuring.
In 2023, Microsoft's SG&A expenses reached a peak, marking a 50% increase from 2014, while IBM's expenses showed a modest rise of 20% over the same period. This divergence underscores the contrasting approaches of these tech titans: Microsoft's growth-driven strategy versus IBM's efficiency-oriented model. As we look to 2024, these trends offer valuable insights into the financial strategies shaping the future of technology.
Who Generates More Revenue? Microsoft Corporation or International Business Machines Corporation
Microsoft Corporation vs International Business Machines Corporation: Efficiency in Cost of Revenue Explored
Microsoft Corporation and International Business Machines Corporation: A Detailed Gross Profit Analysis
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Microsoft Corporation and ServiceNow, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Microsoft Corporation vs Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Trends and Insights
Microsoft Corporation vs International Business Machines Corporation: Strategic Focus on R&D Spending
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Microsoft Corporation and Adobe Inc.
Microsoft Corporation and QUALCOMM Incorporated: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Microsoft Corporation and Shopify Inc.
Microsoft Corporation and International Business Machines Corporation: A Detailed Examination of EBITDA Performance
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Microsoft Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc.
Microsoft Corporation and Texas Instruments Incorporated: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared