Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Vericel Corporation: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

Biotech Giants' SG&A Spending: A Decade of Divergence

__timestampNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.Vericel Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20141798600013774000
Thursday, January 1, 20153248000022479000
Friday, January 1, 20166808100027388000
Sunday, January 1, 201716990600035610000
Monday, January 1, 201824893200049007000
Tuesday, January 1, 201935410000061139000
Wednesday, January 1, 202043330000068836000
Friday, January 1, 202158330000097592000
Saturday, January 1, 2022752700000106903000
Sunday, January 1, 2023887600000120998000
Monday, January 1, 20241007200000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

SG&A Spending Trends: Neurocrine Biosciences vs. Vericel Corporation

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, understanding spending patterns is crucial. Over the past decade, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Vericel Corporation have shown distinct trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Neurocrine's SG&A expenses have surged by nearly 4,800% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy and market expansion. In contrast, Vericel's expenses have increased by approximately 780% over the same period, indicating a more measured approach.

By 2023, Neurocrine's SG&A expenses reached nearly nine times that of Vericel, highlighting its significant investment in administrative and sales capabilities. This divergence in spending underscores the different strategic priorities of these companies. As the biotech sector continues to evolve, monitoring these financial patterns offers valuable insights into corporate strategies and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025