Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. or Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

Biopharma SG&A Cost Management: Neurocrine vs. Supernus

__timestampNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20141798600072471000
Thursday, January 1, 20153248000089204000
Friday, January 1, 201668081000106010000
Sunday, January 1, 2017169906000137905000
Monday, January 1, 2018248932000159888000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019354100000158425000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020433300000200677000
Friday, January 1, 2021583300000304759000
Saturday, January 1, 2022752700000377221000
Sunday, January 1, 2023887600000336361000
Monday, January 1, 20241007200000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Managing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Biopharma Giants

In the competitive world of biopharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have been navigating this financial landscape since 2014. Over the past decade, Neurocrine Biosciences has seen a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing nearly 50 times from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Supernus Pharmaceuticals has managed a more modest increase, with expenses rising by approximately 4.6 times over the same period.

By 2023, Neurocrine's SG&A expenses reached nearly 2.6 times that of Supernus, highlighting a significant divergence in cost management strategies. This trend suggests that while Neurocrine is investing heavily in its operations, Supernus is maintaining a more conservative approach. Investors and industry analysts will find these insights invaluable as they assess the financial health and strategic direction of these two industry players.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025