Novartis AG and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

SG&A Spending: Novartis vs. ACADIA's Strategic Divergence

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.Novartis AG
Wednesday, January 1, 20143274800014993000000
Thursday, January 1, 20159080400014247000000
Friday, January 1, 201618645600014192000000
Sunday, January 1, 201725506200014997000000
Monday, January 1, 201826575800016471000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201932563800014369000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202038866100014197000000
Friday, January 1, 202139602800014886000000
Saturday, January 1, 202236909000014253000000
Sunday, January 1, 202340246600012489000000
Monday, January 1, 202412566000000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Companies

In the world of pharmaceuticals, strategic spending on Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses can be a key differentiator. Over the past decade, Novartis AG and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. have showcased contrasting SG&A spending patterns. Novartis, a global giant, consistently allocated around 14% of its revenue to SG&A, peaking in 2018. In contrast, ACADIA, a smaller player, saw its SG&A expenses grow by over 1,100% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its aggressive expansion strategy. Notably, in 2023, ACADIA's SG&A expenses reached their highest, while Novartis experienced a decline. This divergence highlights the different growth stages and market strategies of these companies. As the pharmaceutical landscape evolves, understanding these spending patterns offers valuable insights into corporate priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025