Novartis AG or Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Novartis vs. Teva

__timestampNovartis AGTeva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014149930000005078000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015142470000004717000000
Friday, January 1, 2016141920000005096000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017149970000004986000000
Monday, January 1, 2018164710000004214000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019143690000003806000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020141970000003671000000
Friday, January 1, 2021148860000003528000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022142530000003445000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023124890000003498000000
Monday, January 1, 2024125660000003702000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Novartis vs. Teva: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the competitive landscape of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Novartis AG and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, Novartis consistently reported higher SG&A expenses, peaking in 2018 with a 10% increase from the previous year. In contrast, Teva's SG&A costs have steadily declined, dropping by approximately 31% over the same period. This trend highlights Teva's aggressive cost-cutting measures, especially evident in the 2020-2023 period, where expenses fell by 5%. Meanwhile, Novartis's expenses saw a significant reduction in 2023, marking a 13% decrease from 2022. These figures underscore the strategic differences between the two giants: Novartis's focus on expansive growth versus Teva's emphasis on lean operations. As the industry evolves, these strategies will continue to shape their financial landscapes.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025