Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Wave Life Sciences Ltd.

Biotech Giants' SG&A: Alnylam vs. Wave Life Sciences

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Wave Life Sciences Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014445260002999000
Thursday, January 1, 20156061000010393000
Friday, January 1, 20168935400015994000
Sunday, January 1, 201719936500026975000
Monday, January 1, 201838235900039509000
Tuesday, January 1, 201947900500048869000
Wednesday, January 1, 202058842000042510000
Friday, January 1, 202162063900046105000
Saturday, January 1, 202277065800050513000
Sunday, January 1, 202379564600051292000
Monday, January 1, 2024975526000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Decade of SG&A Evolution: Alnylam vs. Wave Life Sciences

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, operational efficiency is paramount. Over the past decade, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Wave Life Sciences Ltd. have demonstrated contrasting trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Alnylam's SG&A costs have surged by over 1,600% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market penetration strategies. In contrast, Wave Life Sciences has maintained a more conservative growth, with SG&A expenses increasing by approximately 1,600% over the same period. This disparity highlights Alnylam's robust investment in operational infrastructure, while Wave Life Sciences adopts a more measured approach. As the biotech sector continues to evolve, these financial strategies will play a crucial role in shaping the future of these companies.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025