Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and ImmunityBio, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb vs. ImmunityBio

__timestampBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyImmunityBio, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201456990000004326000
Thursday, January 1, 20155001000000226206000
Friday, January 1, 2016500200000094391000
Sunday, January 1, 2017484900000053821000
Monday, January 1, 2018455100000035463000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019487100000046456000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020766100000071318000
Friday, January 1, 20217690000000135256000
Saturday, January 1, 20227814000000102708000
Sunday, January 1, 20237772000000129620000
Monday, January 1, 20248414000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Tale of Two Companies: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the world of pharmaceuticals and biotechnology, operational efficiency is key. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry players: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and ImmunityBio, Inc., from 2014 to 2023.

Bristol-Myers Squibb: A Steady Climb

Bristol-Myers Squibb, a giant in the pharmaceutical industry, has seen its SG&A expenses grow by approximately 36% over the past decade. Notably, the year 2020 marked a significant increase, with expenses peaking at nearly 8 billion dollars, reflecting strategic investments and expansions.

ImmunityBio: A Different Scale

In contrast, ImmunityBio, a smaller biotech firm, operates on a different scale. Despite a 30-fold increase in SG&A expenses from 2014 to 2023, their expenses remain a fraction of Bristol-Myers Squibb's, highlighting the diverse operational strategies within the sector.

This comparison underscores the varied approaches to managing operational costs in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025