Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Expenses: Gilead vs. Catalyst Over a Decade

__timestampCatalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201444736542983000000
Thursday, January 1, 201585970103426000000
Friday, January 1, 201679102603398000000
Sunday, January 1, 201773043993878000000
Monday, January 1, 2018158759614056000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019368811874381000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020442337545151000000
Friday, January 1, 2021496280005246000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022581830005673000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231337100006090000000
Monday, January 1, 20246091000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

A Decade of SG&A: Gilead vs. Catalyst

In the ever-evolving pharmaceutical industry, operational efficiency is key. Over the past decade, Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown contrasting trends in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Gilead, a giant in the sector, consistently reported SG&A expenses in the billions, peaking at $6.09 billion in 2023. This represents a steady increase of approximately 104% from 2014. In contrast, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, a smaller player, saw a dramatic rise in SG&A expenses, skyrocketing by nearly 2,889% from 2014 to 2023, reaching $133.71 million. This stark difference highlights the varied strategies and growth trajectories of these companies. While Gilead's expenses reflect its expansive operations, Catalyst's surge indicates aggressive scaling and market penetration efforts. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into the strategic priorities and operational challenges faced by pharmaceutical companies today.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025