Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Pfizer Inc. or Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Pfizer vs. Catalyst: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampCatalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Pfizer Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014447365414097000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015859701014809000000
Friday, January 1, 2016791026014837000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017730439914784000000
Monday, January 1, 20181587596114455000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20193688118714350000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20204423375411615000000
Friday, January 1, 20214962800012703000000
Saturday, January 1, 20225818300013677000000
Sunday, January 1, 202313371000014771000000
Monday, January 1, 202414730000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A: A Tale of Two Pharmaceutical Giants

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, Pfizer Inc. and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have taken different paths in optimizing these costs. From 2014 to 2023, Pfizer's SG&A expenses have remained relatively stable, fluctuating around $14 billion annually. In contrast, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals has seen a dramatic increase, with expenses rising from approximately $4.5 million in 2014 to $133 million in 2023, marking a staggering 2,800% increase.

This divergence highlights the distinct strategies of these companies. Pfizer, a global leader, maintains a steady SG&A expenditure, reflecting its established market presence. Meanwhile, Catalyst's rising costs suggest aggressive expansion and investment in growth. Understanding these trends offers valuable insights into how pharmaceutical companies balance cost management with strategic growth.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025