__timestamp | Evotec SE | Gilead Sciences, Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 17990000 | 2983000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 25166000 | 3426000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 27013000 | 3398000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 42383000 | 3878000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 57012000 | 4056000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 66546000 | 4381000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 77238000 | 5151000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 105445000 | 5246000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 156190000 | 5673000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 169610000 | 6090000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 6091000000 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of biotechnology, operational efficiency is paramount. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry titans: Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Evotec SE, from 2014 to 2023.
Gilead Sciences, a leader in antiviral drugs, has seen its SG&A expenses rise steadily over the past decade. From 2014 to 2023, Gilead's expenses increased by over 100%, reflecting its expansive growth and strategic investments. By 2023, Gilead's SG&A expenses reached approximately $6.09 billion, underscoring its commitment to maintaining a robust operational framework.
In contrast, Evotec SE, a prominent player in drug discovery, experienced a more dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, surging by nearly 900% over the same period. This rapid growth, culminating in expenses of around $169 million in 2023, highlights Evotec's aggressive expansion and scaling efforts.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Merck & Co., Inc. vs Evotec SE Trends and Insights
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Novartis AG and Evotec SE
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Gilead Sciences, Inc. or Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Axsome Therapeutics, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Opthea Limited
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Gilead Sciences, Inc. vs Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. vs Evotec SE
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. or Evotec SE
Bausch Health Companies Inc. or Evotec SE: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Evotec SE
Celldex Therapeutics, Inc. or Evotec SE: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?