Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of HUTCHMED (China) Limited and Dynavax Technologies Corporation

SG&A Expenses: HUTCHMED vs. Dynavax, 2014-2023

__timestampDynavax Technologies CorporationHUTCHMED (China) Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 20141776300026684000
Thursday, January 1, 20152218000029829000
Friday, January 1, 20163725700039578000
Sunday, January 1, 20172736700043277000
Monday, January 1, 20186477000048645000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197498600052934000
Wednesday, January 1, 20207925600061349000
Friday, January 1, 2021100156000127125000
Saturday, January 1, 2022131408000136106000
Sunday, January 1, 2023152946000133175999
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

A Comparative Analysis of SG&A Expenses: HUTCHMED vs. Dynavax

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, operational efficiency is paramount. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two prominent players: HUTCHMED (China) Limited and Dynavax Technologies Corporation, from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Dynavax's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 760%, reflecting a strategic expansion and increased operational activities. In contrast, HUTCHMED's expenses grew by around 400%, indicating a more measured approach.

Key Insights

  • 2014-2018: Both companies maintained a steady increase in SG&A expenses, with HUTCHMED consistently outspending Dynavax by about 20%.
  • 2019-2023: Dynavax's expenses accelerated, surpassing HUTCHMED in 2021, and peaking in 2023 with a 15% lead.

This trend highlights Dynavax's aggressive market strategies, while HUTCHMED's growth suggests a focus on sustainable expansion.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025