CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared

SG&A Spending: CymaBay vs. HUTCHMED's Strategic Insights

__timestampCymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Wednesday, January 1, 2014818500026684000
Thursday, January 1, 2015887100029829000
Friday, January 1, 2016964500039578000
Sunday, January 1, 20171238700043277000
Monday, January 1, 20181438100048645000
Tuesday, January 1, 20191923800052934000
Wednesday, January 1, 20201742500061349000
Friday, January 1, 202123040000127125000
Saturday, January 1, 202225116000136106000
Sunday, January 1, 202351953000133175999
Loading chart...

Unleashing insights

SG&A Spending Patterns: A Tale of Two Companies

In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding spending patterns can offer valuable insights into a company's strategic priorities. Over the past decade, CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited have demonstrated distinct approaches to their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, CymaBay's SG&A expenses grew by over 500%, peaking in 2023. This surge reflects a strategic pivot towards aggressive market expansion and operational scaling. In contrast, HUTCHMED's SG&A expenses, while consistently higher, increased by approximately 400% over the same period, indicating a steady commitment to maintaining a robust administrative framework. Notably, in 2021, HUTCHMED's SG&A expenses soared to nearly five times that of CymaBay, underscoring its expansive operational footprint. These trends highlight the diverse strategies employed by pharmaceutical companies in navigating market challenges and opportunities.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025