__timestamp | CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. | HUTCHMED (China) Limited |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 8185000 | 26684000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 8871000 | 29829000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 9645000 | 39578000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 12387000 | 43277000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 14381000 | 48645000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 19238000 | 52934000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 17425000 | 61349000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 23040000 | 127125000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 25116000 | 136106000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 51953000 | 133175999 |
Unleashing insights
In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding spending patterns can offer valuable insights into a company's strategic priorities. Over the past decade, CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited have demonstrated distinct approaches to their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, CymaBay's SG&A expenses grew by over 500%, peaking in 2023. This surge reflects a strategic pivot towards aggressive market expansion and operational scaling. In contrast, HUTCHMED's SG&A expenses, while consistently higher, increased by approximately 400% over the same period, indicating a steady commitment to maintaining a robust administrative framework. Notably, in 2021, HUTCHMED's SG&A expenses soared to nearly five times that of CymaBay, underscoring its expansive operational footprint. These trends highlight the diverse strategies employed by pharmaceutical companies in navigating market challenges and opportunities.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: Eli Lilly and Company vs CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Viatris Inc. or HUTCHMED (China) Limited: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Cytokinetics, Incorporated and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.
Alkermes plc or CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? TG Therapeutics, Inc. or HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc. and HUTCHMED (China) Limited
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: CymaBay Therapeutics, Inc. vs Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for HUTCHMED (China) Limited and Mesoblast Limited
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for HUTCHMED (China) Limited and Geron Corporation
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: HUTCHMED (China) Limited vs Evotec SE