__timestamp | CRISPR Therapeutics AG | Merck & Co., Inc. |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 5114000 | 11606000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 13403000 | 10313000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 31056000 | 9762000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 35845000 | 9830000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 48294000 | 10102000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 63488000 | 10615000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 88208000 | 8955000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 102802000 | 9634000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 102464000 | 10042000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 76162000 | 10504000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 72977000 |
Infusing magic into the data realm
In the ever-evolving landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, operational costs play a pivotal role in shaping a company's financial health. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of two industry titans: Merck & Co., Inc. and CRISPR Therapeutics AG, from 2014 to 2023.
Merck, a stalwart in the pharmaceutical world, consistently reported SG&A expenses averaging around $10 billion annually. Despite fluctuations, their expenses remained relatively stable, reflecting a robust operational strategy. In contrast, CRISPR Therapeutics, a pioneer in gene-editing technology, exhibited a dynamic growth trajectory. Their SG&A expenses surged by over 1,400% from 2014 to 2021, highlighting their aggressive expansion and investment in innovation.
This comparative analysis underscores the diverse strategies employed by established and emerging players in the pharmaceutical sector, offering valuable insights into their operational priorities.
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Eli Lilly and Company and Merck & Co., Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Eli Lilly and Company vs CRISPR Therapeutics AG Trends and Insights
SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Merck & Co., Inc. and Novartis AG
Merck & Co., Inc. vs Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Merck & Co., Inc. vs Merus N.V. Trends and Insights
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Merck & Co., Inc. or Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Comparing SG&A Expenses: Merck & Co., Inc. vs Evotec SE Trends and Insights
Novartis AG or CRISPR Therapeutics AG: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Cost Management Insights: SG&A Expenses for Exelixis, Inc. and CRISPR Therapeutics AG
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. or CRISPR Therapeutics AG: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Alkermes plc and CRISPR Therapeutics AG: SG&A Spending Patterns Compared
Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of CRISPR Therapeutics AG and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.