Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Salesforce, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.

Salesforce vs. Check Point: A Decade of SG&A Strategies

__timestampCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd.Salesforce, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143849210002764851000
Thursday, January 1, 20154517850003437032000
Friday, January 1, 20165086560003951445000
Sunday, January 1, 20175253920004777000000
Monday, January 1, 20185897990005760000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196584000007410000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206814000009634000000
Friday, January 1, 202170850000011761000000
Saturday, January 1, 202279130000014453000000
Sunday, January 1, 202386410000016079000000
Monday, January 1, 202415411000000
Loading chart...

Infusing magic into the data realm

A Decade of SG&A: Salesforce vs. Check Point Software

In the ever-evolving tech industry, operational efficiency is key. Over the past decade, Salesforce, Inc. and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. have showcased contrasting strategies in managing their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, Salesforce's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 480%, reflecting its aggressive growth and expansion strategy. In contrast, Check Point Software's expenses grew by about 124%, indicating a more conservative approach.

Key Insights

  • Salesforce's Growth: By 2023, Salesforce's SG&A expenses reached over $16 billion, a testament to its rapid scaling and market penetration.
  • Check Point's Stability: Check Point's expenses, while increasing, remained under $1 billion, highlighting its focus on steady, sustainable growth.
  • Missing Data: Notably, 2024 data for Check Point is unavailable, suggesting potential reporting delays or strategic shifts.

This analysis underscores the diverse paths tech giants take in navigating operational costs.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025