Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? Salesforce, Inc. or Zebra Technologies Corporation

Salesforce vs. Zebra: A Decade of SG&A Cost Management

__timestampSalesforce, Inc.Zebra Technologies Corporation
Wednesday, January 1, 20142764851000351518000
Thursday, January 1, 20153437032000763025000
Friday, January 1, 20163951445000751000000
Sunday, January 1, 20174777000000749000000
Monday, January 1, 20185760000000811000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20197410000000826000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20209634000000787000000
Friday, January 1, 202111761000000935000000
Saturday, January 1, 202214453000000982000000
Sunday, January 1, 202316079000000915000000
Monday, January 1, 202415411000000981000000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of corporate America, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Salesforce, Inc. and Zebra Technologies Corporation, two giants in their respective fields, offer a fascinating study in contrasts. Over the past decade, Salesforce's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 480%, reflecting its aggressive growth strategy. In contrast, Zebra Technologies has maintained a more stable SG&A cost structure, with a modest increase of around 160% over the same period.

A Decade of Financial Strategy

From 2014 to 2023, Salesforce's SG&A expenses grew from $2.8 billion to $16.1 billion, while Zebra's expenses increased from $351 million to $982 million. This disparity highlights Salesforce's expansive approach compared to Zebra's more conservative financial management. However, the data for 2024 is incomplete, leaving room for speculation on future trends. As businesses navigate the post-pandemic economy, these strategies will be pivotal in determining their market positions.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025