Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. or Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SG&A Cost Management: Amphastar vs. Rhythm

__timestampAmphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014403730001213000
Thursday, January 1, 2015469740003425000
Friday, January 1, 2016472980006311000
Sunday, January 1, 2017509180009518000
Monday, January 1, 20185804400028080000
Tuesday, January 1, 20196310900036550000
Wednesday, January 1, 20206515700046125000
Friday, January 1, 20216892000068486000
Saturday, January 1, 20226659200092032000
Sunday, January 1, 202380393000117532000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

SG&A Cost Management: A Tale of Two Pharmaceuticals

In the competitive world of pharmaceuticals, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have shown contrasting trends in their SG&A expenses from 2014 to 2023. Amphastar has maintained a steady increase, with expenses growing by approximately 99% over the decade. In contrast, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals started with minimal expenses, but by 2023, their SG&A costs surged to nearly 97% of Amphastar's, reflecting a strategic shift or expansion. This data highlights the different growth trajectories and operational strategies of these companies. While Amphastar's consistent growth suggests stable management, Rhythm's rapid increase could indicate aggressive market positioning. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into how each company navigates the financial landscape of the pharmaceutical industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025