SAP SE or NetApp, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

SAP SE vs. NetApp: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampNetApp, Inc.SAP SE
Wednesday, January 1, 201421792000005195000000
Thursday, January 1, 201521974000006449000000
Friday, January 1, 201620990000007299000000
Sunday, January 1, 201719040000007999000000
Monday, January 1, 201820090000007879000000
Tuesday, January 1, 201919350000009318000000
Wednesday, January 1, 202018480000008461000000
Friday, January 1, 202120010000009936000000
Saturday, January 1, 2022213600000011015000000
Sunday, January 1, 2023209400000010192000000
Monday, January 1, 2024213600000010254000000
Loading chart...

Unleashing the power of data

SAP SE vs. NetApp, Inc.: A Decade of SG&A Management

In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, SAP SE and NetApp, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, SAP SE's SG&A expenses have shown a significant upward trend, peaking at approximately $11 billion in 2022, reflecting a 112% increase from 2014. In contrast, NetApp, Inc. has maintained a more stable SG&A expenditure, with a slight decrease of around 2% over the same period, averaging around $2 billion annually.

This data highlights SAP SE's aggressive expansion strategy, potentially investing heavily in marketing and administrative capabilities. Meanwhile, NetApp, Inc.'s consistent SG&A spending suggests a more conservative approach, focusing on efficiency and cost control. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, these insights offer valuable lessons in strategic financial management.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025