__timestamp | NetApp, Inc. | SAP SE |
---|---|---|
Wednesday, January 1, 2014 | 2179200000 | 5195000000 |
Thursday, January 1, 2015 | 2197400000 | 6449000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2016 | 2099000000 | 7299000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2017 | 1904000000 | 7999000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2018 | 2009000000 | 7879000000 |
Tuesday, January 1, 2019 | 1935000000 | 9318000000 |
Wednesday, January 1, 2020 | 1848000000 | 8461000000 |
Friday, January 1, 2021 | 2001000000 | 9936000000 |
Saturday, January 1, 2022 | 2136000000 | 11015000000 |
Sunday, January 1, 2023 | 2094000000 | 10192000000 |
Monday, January 1, 2024 | 2136000000 | 10254000000 |
Unleashing the power of data
In the ever-evolving landscape of global business, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. Over the past decade, SAP SE and NetApp, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting approaches to SG&A cost management. From 2014 to 2023, SAP SE's SG&A expenses have shown a significant upward trend, peaking at approximately $11 billion in 2022, reflecting a 112% increase from 2014. In contrast, NetApp, Inc. has maintained a more stable SG&A expenditure, with a slight decrease of around 2% over the same period, averaging around $2 billion annually.
This data highlights SAP SE's aggressive expansion strategy, potentially investing heavily in marketing and administrative capabilities. Meanwhile, NetApp, Inc.'s consistent SG&A spending suggests a more conservative approach, focusing on efficiency and cost control. As businesses navigate the complexities of the modern economy, these insights offer valuable lessons in strategic financial management.
SAP SE vs NetApp, Inc.: Annual Revenue Growth Compared
Cost of Revenue Comparison: SAP SE vs NetApp, Inc.
Gross Profit Comparison: SAP SE and NetApp, Inc. Trends
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? SAP SE or Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
R&D Insights: How SAP SE and NetApp, Inc. Allocate Funds
Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: SAP SE vs Nokia Oyj
SAP SE or Teledyne Technologies Incorporated: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
SAP SE or ON Semiconductor Corporation: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?
Comparing SG&A Expenses: SAP SE vs FLEETCOR Technologies, Inc. Trends and Insights
Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? SAP SE or Ubiquiti Inc.
Breaking Down SG&A Expenses: SAP SE vs STMicroelectronics N.V.
A Professional Review of EBITDA: SAP SE Compared to NetApp, Inc.