Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? SAP SE or Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)

SAP vs. Ericsson: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

__timestampSAP SETelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
Wednesday, January 1, 2014519500000027100000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015644900000029285000000
Friday, January 1, 2016729900000028866000000
Sunday, January 1, 2017799900000032676000000
Monday, January 1, 2018787900000027519000000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019931800000026137000000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020846100000026684000000
Friday, January 1, 2021993600000026957000000
Saturday, January 1, 20221101500000035692000000
Sunday, January 1, 20231019200000037682000000
Monday, January 1, 202410254000000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Tale of Two Giants

In the competitive landscape of global technology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for profitability. Over the past decade, SAP SE and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) have showcased contrasting strategies in this domain. From 2014 to 2023, SAP SE's SG&A expenses grew by approximately 88%, peaking in 2022. In contrast, Ericsson's expenses surged by about 39% during the same period, with a notable spike in 2023.

While SAP SE's expenses remained relatively stable, Ericsson's fluctuated, reflecting its dynamic market strategies. By 2023, Ericsson's SG&A costs were nearly four times those of SAP SE, highlighting its aggressive expansion and market penetration efforts. This data underscores the strategic choices each company makes in balancing cost management with growth ambitions. As the tech industry evolves, these insights offer a glimpse into the financial stewardship of two industry titans.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025