ASML Holding N.V. vs Pure Storage, Inc.: SG&A Expense Trends

Tech Giants' SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Strategic Growth

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Pure Storage, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201431867200060652000
Thursday, January 1, 2015345700000184674000
Friday, January 1, 2016374800000315976000
Sunday, January 1, 2017416600000444687000
Monday, January 1, 2018488000000575200000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019520500000721617000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020544900000891175000
Friday, January 1, 2021725600000898491000
Saturday, January 1, 2022909600000988982000
Sunday, January 1, 202311132000001121605000
Monday, January 1, 202411657000001197264000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Expense Trends: ASML Holding N.V. vs Pure Storage, Inc.

In the ever-evolving landscape of technology, understanding the financial strategies of industry leaders is crucial. This analysis delves into the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of ASML Holding N.V. and Pure Storage, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, ASML's SG&A expenses have surged by approximately 250%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and market dominance. Meanwhile, Pure Storage has seen an even more dramatic increase of nearly 1,750%, highlighting its rapid growth trajectory in the data storage sector.

Key Insights

  • ASML Holding N.V.: From 2014 to 2023, ASML's SG&A expenses grew steadily, peaking in 2023, indicating strategic investments in marketing and administration.
  • Pure Storage, Inc.: Despite starting with lower expenses, Pure Storage's SG&A costs have consistently risen, surpassing ASML in 2023, showcasing its commitment to scaling operations.

This financial journey underscores the dynamic strategies employed by these tech giants to maintain their competitive edge.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025