Who Optimizes SG&A Costs Better? ASML Holding N.V. or Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.

ASML vs. Check Point: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

__timestampASML Holding N.V.Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014318672000384921000
Thursday, January 1, 2015345700000451785000
Friday, January 1, 2016374800000508656000
Sunday, January 1, 2017416600000525392000
Monday, January 1, 2018488000000589799000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019520500000658400000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020544900000681400000
Friday, January 1, 2021725600000708500000
Saturday, January 1, 2022909600000791300000
Sunday, January 1, 20231113200000864100000
Monday, January 1, 20241165700000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

Optimizing SG&A Costs: A Comparative Analysis

In the competitive landscape of technology giants, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability. ASML Holding N.V. and Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. have been at the forefront of this financial discipline since 2014. Over the past decade, ASML has seen a significant increase in SG&A expenses, rising by approximately 250% from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Check Point's SG&A costs have grown by about 125% during the same period.

Key Insights

ASML's expenses surged notably in 2021, reflecting strategic investments in growth and innovation. Meanwhile, Check Point has maintained a more consistent expense trajectory, indicating a focus on operational efficiency. By 2023, ASML's SG&A expenses were about 29% higher than Check Point's, highlighting differing approaches to cost management. This analysis underscores the importance of strategic financial planning in sustaining competitive advantage in the tech industry.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
28 Jan 2025