Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Exelixis, Inc. vs BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech Giants: SG&A Expenses Compared Over a Decade

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Exelixis, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014746100050829000
Thursday, January 1, 20151304700057305000
Friday, January 1, 201611253000116145000
Sunday, January 1, 201713933000159362000
Monday, January 1, 201829514000206366000
Tuesday, January 1, 201937121000228244000
Wednesday, January 1, 202067929000293355000
Friday, January 1, 2021118818000401715000
Saturday, January 1, 2022159371000459856000
Sunday, January 1, 2023213894000542705000
Monday, January 1, 2024492128000
Loading chart...

Unlocking the unknown

A Tale of Two Biotechs: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing costs is crucial for success. This chart compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Exelixis, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Exelixis consistently outspent BioCryst, with its SG&A expenses growing by over 900%, from approximately $51 million in 2014 to $543 million in 2023. In contrast, BioCryst's expenses increased by nearly 280%, from around $7 million to $214 million. This disparity highlights Exelixis's aggressive expansion strategy, possibly reflecting its larger scale and broader market reach. Meanwhile, BioCryst's more conservative spending may indicate a focus on niche markets or a more cautious growth approach. Understanding these financial strategies provides valuable insights into each company's operational priorities and market positioning.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025