SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

SG&A Strategies: BioCryst vs. Catalyst Pharmaceuticals

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201474610004473654
Thursday, January 1, 2015130470008597010
Friday, January 1, 2016112530007910260
Sunday, January 1, 2017139330007304399
Monday, January 1, 20182951400015875961
Tuesday, January 1, 20193712100036881187
Wednesday, January 1, 20206792900044233754
Friday, January 1, 202111881800049628000
Saturday, January 1, 202215937100058183000
Sunday, January 1, 2023213894000133710000
Loading chart...

Igniting the spark of knowledge

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biopharma Companies

In the competitive world of biopharmaceuticals, managing operational costs is crucial for success. Over the past decade, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting strategies in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. From 2014 to 2023, BioCryst's SG&A expenses surged by nearly 2,800%, peaking at $213 million in 2023. This reflects their aggressive expansion and investment in administrative capabilities. In contrast, Catalyst Pharmaceuticals maintained a more conservative growth, with SG&A expenses increasing by approximately 2,900% to $134 million in the same period. This strategic restraint may indicate a focus on operational efficiency and cost management. As these companies navigate the evolving pharmaceutical landscape, their SG&A strategies will be pivotal in determining their competitive edge and financial health.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025