PTC Therapeutics, Inc. or BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Who Manages SG&A Costs Better?

PTC vs. BioCryst: SG&A Cost Management Showdown

__timestampBioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014746100044820000
Thursday, January 1, 20151304700082080000
Friday, January 1, 20161125300097130000
Sunday, January 1, 201713933000121271000
Monday, January 1, 201829514000153548000
Tuesday, January 1, 201937121000202541000
Wednesday, January 1, 202067929000245164000
Friday, January 1, 2021118818000285773000
Saturday, January 1, 2022159371000325998000
Sunday, January 1, 2023213894000332540000
Loading chart...

Unveiling the hidden dimensions of data

Who Manages SG&A Costs Better: PTC Therapeutics or BioCryst Pharmaceuticals?

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, managing Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial for maintaining profitability and operational efficiency. Over the past decade, PTC Therapeutics and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals have shown distinct trends in their SG&A expenditures. From 2014 to 2023, PTC Therapeutics consistently reported higher SG&A costs, peaking at approximately $332 million in 2023, a 642% increase from 2014. In contrast, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, while also experiencing a rise, managed to keep their expenses significantly lower, reaching around $214 million in 2023, marking a 2,769% increase from 2014. This stark difference highlights PTC's aggressive expansion strategy, while BioCryst appears to adopt a more conservative approach. Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and operational efficiencies, offering investors a clearer picture of their financial health and management effectiveness.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025