Selling, General, and Administrative Costs: Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. vs Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A Expenses: A Decade of Divergence

__timestampAmphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20144037300017986000
Thursday, January 1, 20154697400032480000
Friday, January 1, 20164729800068081000
Sunday, January 1, 201750918000169906000
Monday, January 1, 201858044000248932000
Tuesday, January 1, 201963109000354100000
Wednesday, January 1, 202065157000433300000
Friday, January 1, 202168920000583300000
Saturday, January 1, 202266592000752700000
Sunday, January 1, 202380393000887600000
Monday, January 1, 20241007200000
Loading chart...

In pursuit of knowledge

A Tale of Two Biotechs: SG&A Expenses Over Time

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing costs is crucial for success. This chart compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2014 to 2023. Over this period, Neurocrine Biosciences has seen a staggering increase in SG&A expenses, growing nearly 50 times from 2014 to 2023. In contrast, Amphastar Pharmaceuticals experienced a more modest growth of about 100% in the same timeframe. By 2023, Neurocrine's SG&A expenses were approximately 11 times higher than Amphastar's, highlighting a significant divergence in their financial strategies. This data provides a fascinating insight into how these companies allocate resources to support their operations and growth. Understanding these trends can offer valuable lessons for investors and industry analysts alike.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025