SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Viking Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotech SG&A Trends: ADMA vs. Viking

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Viking Therapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 201448238691244910
Thursday, January 1, 201567459685029636
Friday, January 1, 201684947424846776
Sunday, January 1, 2017180928355329003
Monday, January 1, 2018225029227121000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019259107579128000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203505081710731000
Friday, January 1, 20214289688910701000
Saturday, January 1, 20225245802416121000
Sunday, January 1, 20235902000037021000
Loading chart...

Cracking the code

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biotechs

In the competitive world of biotechnology, managing operational expenses is crucial for success. This analysis compares the Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses of ADMA Biologics, Inc. and Viking Therapeutics, Inc. over a decade, from 2014 to 2023.

ADMA Biologics, Inc.

ADMA Biologics has seen a significant increase in SG&A expenses, growing by over 1,100% from 2014 to 2023. This rise reflects the company's aggressive expansion and investment in operational capabilities. By 2023, their SG&A expenses reached nearly $59 million, indicating a robust growth strategy.

Viking Therapeutics, Inc.

In contrast, Viking Therapeutics experienced a more moderate increase of approximately 2,900% in the same period, with expenses peaking at around $37 million in 2023. This suggests a more conservative approach to scaling operations.

Conclusion

Understanding these trends provides valuable insights into each company's strategic priorities and operational efficiency.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025