SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Novartis AG and ADMA Biologics, Inc.

SG&A Trends: Novartis vs. ADMA Biologics

__timestampADMA Biologics, Inc.Novartis AG
Wednesday, January 1, 2014482386914993000000
Thursday, January 1, 2015674596814247000000
Friday, January 1, 2016849474214192000000
Sunday, January 1, 20171809283514997000000
Monday, January 1, 20182250292216471000000
Tuesday, January 1, 20192591075714369000000
Wednesday, January 1, 20203505081714197000000
Friday, January 1, 20214289688914886000000
Saturday, January 1, 20225245802414253000000
Sunday, January 1, 20235902000012489000000
Monday, January 1, 202412566000000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Companies

In the competitive landscape of the pharmaceutical industry, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Novartis AG and ADMA Biologics, Inc. have showcased contrasting trends in their SG&A expenditures.

Novartis AG: A Giant's Journey

From 2014 to 2023, Novartis AG, a global leader, maintained a steady SG&A expense, averaging around $14.5 billion annually. Despite a slight dip in 2023, their strategic management has kept expenses relatively stable, reflecting a robust operational framework.

ADMA Biologics, Inc.: A Growth Story

Conversely, ADMA Biologics, Inc., a smaller player, saw a dramatic increase in SG&A expenses, surging by over 1,100% from 2014 to 2023. This growth mirrors their aggressive expansion strategy, aiming to capture a larger market share.

Conclusion

These trends highlight the diverse strategies employed by pharmaceutical companies in managing operational costs, offering valuable insights for investors and industry analysts.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025