SG&A Efficiency Analysis: Comparing Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biopharma SG&A Efficiency: Alnylam vs. ACADIA

__timestampACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 20143274800044526000
Thursday, January 1, 20159080400060610000
Friday, January 1, 201618645600089354000
Sunday, January 1, 2017255062000199365000
Monday, January 1, 2018265758000382359000
Tuesday, January 1, 2019325638000479005000
Wednesday, January 1, 2020388661000588420000
Friday, January 1, 2021396028000620639000
Saturday, January 1, 2022369090000770658000
Sunday, January 1, 2023402466000795646000
Monday, January 1, 2024975526000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

SG&A Efficiency: A Tale of Two Biopharma Giants

In the competitive landscape of biopharmaceuticals, understanding the efficiency of Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses is crucial. Over the past decade, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. have shown distinct trajectories in their SG&A spending. From 2014 to 2023, Alnylam's SG&A expenses surged by approximately 1,700%, reflecting its aggressive expansion and investment in innovation. In contrast, ACADIA's expenses grew by about 1,130%, indicating a more measured approach.

Key Insights

  • 2014-2018: Alnylam's expenses increased by over 750%, while ACADIA's rose by 710%.
  • 2019-2023: Alnylam maintained a steady growth, peaking at nearly double ACADIA's expenses in 2023.

This analysis highlights the strategic differences in managing operational costs, with Alnylam focusing on rapid growth and ACADIA on sustainable scaling.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025