Operational Costs Compared: SG&A Analysis of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Biotech Giants' SG&A: Alnylam vs. Iovance

__timestampAlnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Wednesday, January 1, 2014445260009335772
Thursday, January 1, 20156061000012390000
Friday, January 1, 20168935400025602000
Sunday, January 1, 201719936500021262000
Monday, January 1, 201838235900028430000
Tuesday, January 1, 201947900500040849000
Wednesday, January 1, 202058842000060210000
Friday, January 1, 202162063900083664000
Saturday, January 1, 2022770658000104097000
Sunday, January 1, 2023795646000106916000
Monday, January 1, 2024975526000
Loading chart...

Data in motion

A Decade of SG&A Evolution: Alnylam vs. Iovance

In the competitive landscape of biotechnology, operational efficiency is paramount. Over the past decade, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Iovance Biotherapeutics, Inc. have demonstrated contrasting trajectories in their Selling, General, and Administrative (SG&A) expenses. Alnylam's SG&A costs have surged by over 1,600% from 2014 to 2023, reflecting its aggressive expansion and strategic investments. In contrast, Iovance's expenses have grown by approximately 1,000%, indicating a more measured approach.

Key Insights

  • Alnylam's Growth: By 2023, Alnylam's SG&A expenses reached nearly 800 million, a testament to its robust growth strategy.
  • Iovance's Strategy: Iovance, while smaller in scale, has consistently increased its SG&A spending, peaking at around 107 million in 2023.

These trends highlight the diverse strategies employed by biotech firms in managing operational costs, crucial for sustaining innovation and market presence.

Published by
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Source link
sec.gov

Date published
17 Jan 2025